Blog

Tenther presidential candidates getting press in Florida

Some Florida media outlets are pointing out that Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are Tenthers. Their support of the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution is likely to resonate among Florida’s voters.

“Obama won America’s biggest swing state by 3 percentage points in 2008, and he has signaled he will fight hard for the state again in 2012. Already, it’s clear that he has considerable work to do to make his incumbency an asset, rather than a liability, in a Florida that has drifted more conservative than even four years ago.” (Ron Sachs quoted in Tampa Bay News).

The Feb 2011 CPAC straw poll demonstrated the enthusiasm that conservative voters have for tenth amendment supporters like Ron Paul and Gary Johnson, who both featured in the top three when pitted against well known GOP favorites like Bachman, Cain, Huckabee, Palin, Romney, and Santorum.

Both Ron Paul and Gary Johnson have been vocal supporters of the Tenth Amendment.

Ron Paul was recently quoted in the Sunshine news:  “I think (nullification) is a very good idea. I don’t like big, national government.” and Gary Johnson recently called nullification “a formula for righting all our wrongs”

Jamie Davis, Communications Director for the Florida Tenth Amendment Center  commented on the coverage: “Florida has a tremendous conservative voting block and an energized tea party movement. What matters to most Florida voters is smaller government, lower taxes, and more personal liberty. But many Floridians are growing wary of politicians who have the right rhetoric but the wrong record. The increasing divergence between rhetoric and record is why I expect to see an even greater shift towards more constitutionally minded candidates like Ron Paul and Gary Johnson.”

“They haven’t come very close to tackling the problem,” said Ron Paul about congressional Republicans. “It’s not a budget problem, it’s a problem with deciding what the role of government should be.”

Fly Naked to Expedite Air Travel

If US media coverage is any indication, the public interest in the unconstitutional  TSA screening processes is waning seriously just when we need it to spike to support the state legislation that has recently been introduced.

Consider this recent article in the UK Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/10/transport-usdomesticpolicy

The TSA (actual motivational motto: “Dominate. Intimidate. Control.”) decided “ritualised humiliation of travelers” made an acceptable substitute for “transportation security.” Last year, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) started pushing nude scanners on the American flying public. These require travellers to adopt surrender-criminal body positions – feet apart, hands in the air, don’t move – while potentially carcenogenic radiation generates nude images graphic enough to permit TSA agents to see travellers’ genitalia (though not, apparently, clear enough to show guns smuggled in travellers’ undies).

Last week, however, state legislators in Texas and New Hampshire introduced legislation identifying TSA behaviour as the criminal activity it is. (Similar bills have already been proposed in New Jersey, but are currently stalled in committee.) The Texas bill, co-written by a Republican and a Democrat with support from 20 other legislators spanning the political spectrum, would ban the scanners in state airports, and add TSA-style grope-downs to the list of “sexual assault” offences in the penal code. The New Hampshire bill would make “the touching or viewing with a technological device of a person’s breasts or genitals by a government security agent without probable cause a sexual assault.” The TSA has completely ignored those two words – probable cause – since its inception.”

Consider the track record of Isreal as summarized in this article

In Israel you can carry liquids on to the plane, they don’t do electronic strip searches, they don’t perform sexual assault (the unwanted touch of any individual against any other person’s genitals) on their travelers, and they have a perfect security record for several decades now. All of this while being the number one target for terrorist activity in the world. 

The absurdity of the TSA policies is clear when reviewing the behavior from a safe distance as pointed out by this blogger.

The GAO released a report that said at least 16 individuals later accused of involvement in terrorist plots flew 23 different times through U.S. airports since 2004. Yet none were stopped by TSA behavior detection officers working at those airports. None.

The bottom line is, the TSA spends $6.3 BILLION per year, has 60,000 employees, and has does not seem to have made us safer. Their argument might be that TSA run programs prevent people from even trying… but security existed in the airports for decades prior to the TSA and the results were no different.

So what can WE THE PEOPLE do to raise awareness and to flex our inalienable rights?

Well some people have already been paving the way and testing the response of the TSA.

Medical doctors have sent letters to DC expressing their concern over the radiation and the risk of spreading disease through the pat downs. See this and this. Their comments have brought light to the accuracy of the safety tests regarding the radiation and the TSA has admitted at leasts some of the tests were flawed.

“It would appear that the emissions are 10 times higher. We understand it as a calculation error,” TSA spokesman Sarah Horowitz said in a telephone interview.

Citizens from all around the country have refused to go through the scanners and have found creative ways to show that they had nothing to hide.

One man stripped to his underwear, another lady went through in a bikini.

One man, wrote an abbreviated version of the 4th amendment on his chest and stripped down to reveal it while refusing the pat down.  

“Tobey was unduly seized by government agents in violation of the Fourth Amendment, despite the fact that he did nothing to disrupt airport routine,” says John W. Whitehead, president of the Rutherford Institute in a statement.

There are several ethical issues involved in the dilemma over submitting to the radiation and pat down screenings. Some, like Tenth Amendment Center founder Mike Boldin, have opted not to fly so that they do not embolden the TSA to sexually molest citizens with government sanction but without probable cause.

Many would prefer to drive or stay home than to unwittingly give their silent approval (by sumbitting to the process) to TSA agents who sometimes fondle women with prosthetic breasts, leaves a bladder cancer patient covered in urine, anger and humiliate random citizens, and leave 3 year children crying and screaming stop touching me.  

What would Jesus, Ghandi, or Martin Luther King do about this ethical dilemma?

Martin Luther King and Ghandi were champions of non-violent visible mass resistance. 

Jesus, in dealing with a government official that would force a citizen to walk one mile, suggested that they go two (Matthew 5:41). He advised that citizens should exceed what is required. In doing so, the citizen is not cowering as he is being dominated, intimidated, or controled.  Instead the citizen is making an empowering choice.

I wonder if that is what the maker of this tshirt had in mind with his catchy slogan:

Expedite Air Travel, Fly Naked.

It seems to me that wearing the tshirt or complying with its mesage, would both be effective ways to exercise dissent and increase the visibility of the continued violation of the rights of US citizens in clear violation of the 4th amendment. 

I should not be subjected to what is government-sanctioned sexual assault in order to board a plane.” Sharon Kiss, 66

Intrastate Commerce Act Advancing in Florida

The Florida Tenth Amendment Center and Florida Campaign for Liberty are pleased to announce that the Intrastate Commerce Act has secured a sponsor in the Senate and was filed on March 1, 2011 by Senator Greg Evers. The legislation will help Florida adhere to the separation of powers called for under the Tenth Amendment of the US constitution and will prevent the Federal Government from regulating Intrastate Commerce where a good or service is provided by Floridians to Floridians.

SB1478 has many advantages. Unlike various firearm freedom act and food freedom protection acts, the intrastate commerce act covers every item manufactured and used inside a sovereign state. And unlike the non-binding memorial currently being considered in the Florida House, SB1478 has the force of law and includes the ability to enforce penalties against Federal Agents who harass Florida businesses.

Recently Federal Judge in NW Florida ruled that the Federal Government had over-stepped its authority in forcing citizens of the states to purchase health insurance. Greg Evers has this to say about the ruling:

“Today’s ruling reaffirms what most people already knew; the federal health care law was an unconstitutional infringement on the freedom of individuals to make their own health care decisions. I applaud Judge Vinson for protecting Northwest Floridians from this overreaching federal mandate. Judge Vinson’s decision is a victory for the US Constitution in his wise recognition that it is alive and well as a boundary and a limit on Congressional power grabs.”

The US Constitution was designed to ensure that the states would act as a powerful check and balance on Federal power and over-reach. Although many states have in recent decades abdicated their responsibility of nullifying unconstitutional laws, this does not weaken the spirit of the Tenth Amendment or its force of law. It is a relevant, powerful, and timely tool for puhsing back on Federal over-reach.

“The several states who formed that instrument, being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of its infraction, and that a NULLIFICATION by those sovereignties, of all unauthorized acts done under color of that instrument, is the rightful remedy.”        Thomas Jefferson

The Florida Tenth Amendment Center (FLTAC) and the Florida Campaign for Liberty (FLC4L) encourage Floridians to call or email Greg Evers and thank him sponsoring SB1478.  We also encourage you to call Scott Plakon, Chairman of the House Sub Committee, and let him know you would appreciate his help in identifying a house sponsor for SB1478. Mr. Plakon can be reached at (850) 488-2231.

http://florida.tenthamendmentcenter.com
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/usa/FL/#overview

High Speed Train to Insolvency

Open Letter to Florida Governor Rick Scott

The Florida Tenth Amendment Center wants to thank you for your transparency in outlining the principles that will guide your administration. For example, Accountability Budgeting as outlined on page 10 of your Jobs Booklet which specifies that your administration will refuse temporary funding that creates permanent spending.

In recent weeks , several groups have published opinion papers, research reports, and other types of commentary regarding the proposed High Speed Rail Project. Many of these claim that the project would require permanent spending in order to maintain and or subsidize any high speed rail operations.

 “One, from the Reason Foundation, projects that the price for building the rail line could more than double, leaving Florida taxpayers on the hook. The other, from a New York-based planning advocacy group (America 2050), ranks the proposed line well below other prospective regional links due largely to comparatively spread-out population centers.” http://tiny.cc/tampa_rail_article    /   http://reason.org/news/show/florida-taxpayers-ultimately-respon   http://tiny.cc/america_2050_rail

In addition, it seems that the business case for high speed rail has not been thoroughly vetted. In a recent interview, the CEO of CSX Railroad indicated that there are valid business reasons that CSX has stayed out of the passenger business and he challenges the myth that high speed rail will be financially self-sustaining.

“People see high-speed trains in France, Spain, Japan and China and love them. Our country, what we’ve chosen to do, is build airports and highways. We have this view that Amtrak is supposed to make money and there’s not a passenger system in the world that’s making money. I think you have to view that as something you provide to the public just like you do airports, highways and ports. The government decides how they are going to deploy mobility for its citizens and so far, no one has been willing to spend the monies that it would take to do high-speed rail.” Michael Ward http://tiny.cc/csx_quote_rail

Other states including Ohio and Wisconsin have studied the issue and have decided to turn away high speed rail money in their states based on the same type of concerns. In his open letter to President Obama, Scott Walker addresses hidden costs and the burden they will one day represent to taxpayers.

“As for hidden costs, no one in your administration, nor Governor Doyle or Mayor Barrett can provide an accurate estimate of what it will cost to operate and maintain the new rail line. Rail projects in numerous other areas have seen original cost estimates skyrocket once construction begins. In addition, study after study shows that rail passenger fares are likely to cover only 20% of the operating costs. That leaves hardworking Wisconsin families to pick up the other 80% through higher taxes and fees. “ Wisconsin Governor, Scott Walker

The Florida Tenth Amendment Center is supportive of your efforts to strengthen Florida’s economy but we see the High Speed Rail discussion as a distraction to that effort and as an untenable risk to Florida’s long term economic prospects. At a time when one of the hottest topics in DC is allowing states to go bankrupt  (http://tinyurl.com/statebankruptcy) , and when Florida is reported to have a $3 billion dollar budget gap, we should not be even discussing High Speed Rail.

“Florida has abandoned rail travel at a state government level for some 50 years, and a magic flying train will not be the quick fix in the game of catch up.” Robert W. Mann (http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2010-nov-florida-high-speed-rail-the-conservative-way)

In light of the information presented by various groups on the substantial risk of cost-overruns on the build and maintain phase of high speed rail, and in light of your own stated principle of not accepting temporary federal funds which will result in permanent spending increases; please, let’s just refuse the Federal funds and focus on making Florida strong enough to not require funding from an out of control Federal Government.

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

http://florida.tenthamendmentcenter.com

Tenth Amendment and the Tea Party

To watch the video, click here:

Jax 10A Leader Speaks to St Aug Tea Party Jan 2011

Prepared Remarks:

 The Intersection of Tenth and Tea.

How the Tenth Amendment can help the Tea Party Realize its goals in 2011. 

How many have you have made new year resolutions for 2011?

I’ve got a few suggestions, what do you think about these?

Lower Taxes
Less Government
More Liberty

I’d like to speak with you tonight about the tenth amendment and how it can help you achieve these goals, this year.

Tea Party Values:

Now I’m speaking today at a meeting of the St Augustine Tea Party and so I reviewed your website to see what was important to you.

  • Constitutional Government
  • Limited Government
  • Fiscal Responsibility

Now what I really like about your focus is that you have somehow avoided divisive social issues. In actuality, this is exactly the same approach the founding fathers used in framing our constitution.  They avoided social issues of their day such as gambling and prostitution.

Gambling
“Gambling quickly became a problem in Virginia. Captain John Smith complained about men “devoted only to idleness.” Gambling can be highly addictive and often correlates with illegal activity, broken families, unemployment, homelessness, and results in annual legal and social costs   which are significant.   In light of the presence of gambling and the strong Judeo-Christian ethic of our founders, some may find it surprising that gambling is not referenced in the constitution or early federal laws. But there were laws about gambling in early America, state laws.

Prostitution
Prostitution, the oldest profession which often in reality resembles cold blooded sexual slavery, is often associated with child kidnapping, broken marriages and venereal diseases all of which have significant societal costs. So how did the founders handle this dangerous and immoral practice? The constitution was and is completely silent on the issue.

“Prostitution was not an offense in either English or American common law, and, prior to World War I, although being a prostitute was not an offense, prostitution was generally regulated as a specific sort of vagrancy. When prostitutes were punished as sexual deviants, it was under laws against adultery or fornication or for being ‘common nightwalkers’–women who strolled the streets at night for immoral purposes. It was not until 1917 in Massachusetts, however, that a prostitute could be punished for prostitution.”

Why did the founders not constrain the people’s wicked tendencies by federal law?
Could not the federal government have inserted language to regulate prostitution or gambling at the Federal level?  The founders well understood the dangers of man’s tendency to be corrupted by power so they were opposed to giving central government too much authority.

“Aware of the tendency of power to degenerate into abuse, the worthies of our country have secured its independence by the establishment of a Constitution and form of government for our nation, calculated to prevent as well as to correct abuse.” –Thomas Jefferson to Washington Tammany Society, 1809.

The founders framed a Federal government with authority to govern regarding specifically enumerated powers so the Federal Government would not grow into a tyranny that intruded into all manner of its citizen’s private lives.

Across the country there are people who are waking up to the fact our government is constantly growing and intruding into our lives in unprecedented ways.  People are waking up to the fact that due to unchecked growth of government, we are in empire in decline. People can sense it in the air. This is perhaps the first generation of Americans that believes their kids will be worse off than they are in terms of prosperity and liberty.

The signs of decay are all around us & they remind us how far we are from the vision of our founding fathers:

  • We are now the largest debtor nation in the world, in the history of the world.

It took the US 214 years to accumulate 3 trillion dollars in debt. But our current administration has done it again in only 633 days. The overall debt of the federal government, according to the Treasury Department, is now $13.666 trillion. And that does not include unfunded liabilities.

  • Our legislators apparently believe that their job to bring home the bacon instead of balancing the budget.

There are more Americans on food stamps now than ever in our history, even in % terms.

  • Our government has violated the constitution so egregiously that our officials now don’t even want to be reminded of what the (constitution) document says.

Mind you this is the document they took a solemn oath to uphold and defend.  Many complained about the reading of the constitution, some refused to enter the chamber, and one representative even said that reading the constitution was leading to the politically charged climate that has recently spilled over into violence.

I ask you, is it the reading of the constitution that has created our current problems? No our problems are due to the fact that our leaders have ignored the constitutional limits of government for far too long.

But it is not just our leaders that are to blame. 

Our founders warned us to be vigilant in watching our elected leaders.

Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories.  Thomas Jefferson, 1781

And TJ told us exactly what to keep an eye on, he called them the anchors of our union:

“To preserve the republican form and principles of our Constitution and cleave to the salutary distribution of powers which that [the Constitution] has established… are the two sheet anchors of our Union. If driven from either, we shall be in danger of foundering. “ Thomas Jefferson, letter to Judge William Johnson, June 12, 1823

What does he mean by republican form?

A Republic is a representative government ruled by law (the Constitution).  

The most sacred of the duties of a government [is] to do equal and impartial justice to all citizens.  Thomas Jefferson, Note in Destutt de Tracy, 1816

“In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”  Thomas Jefferson, fair copy of the drafts of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, 1798

What does he mean by principles of our constitution?

He means by that the principles that the constitution rests on and relies on like inalienable rights and natural law.

The republican is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind.  Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Hunter, March 11, 1790

Quotations such as “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”, “Laws of Nature” and concepts for a new “more perfect” form of government with a written Constitution and independent Judiciary and the sovereignty of the People are right out of Vattel’s Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law. (1)

What does he mean by distribution of powers?

The power to govern is shared between national and state governments. It is a system with conflict built in on purpose because of an underlying assumption that too much power in any one set of hands will have a bad outcome.

“It is not by the consolidation, or concentration of powers, but by their distribution, that good government is effected.” –Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:122

“I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground that ‘all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.’ To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, not longer susceptible of any definition. “
Thomas Jefferson, February 15, 1791

So if governing by the rule of law, inalienable rights, and separation of powers are our anchors, where are we today? We are adrift…adrift in dangerous waters. We would likely not be in this condition had we heeded his warning.

Luckily, the founders also foresaw that trouble would arise due to the gradual accumulation of too much power in one branch of government, and in the constitution they provided a mechanism for curing the situation. The cure is administered by the people of the states using The Tenth Amendment to put the federal government back in its place.

The Tenth Amendment States: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Today we are seeing a great awakening of people to the rights accorded them in the constitution and the bill of rights. The Tenth Amendment is being rediscovered and most states are in the process of taking action to nullify Federal overreach.

“The principle and construction contended for that the general government is the exclusive judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it, stop nothing short of despotism – since the discretion of those who administer the government, and not the constitution, would be the measure of their powers: That the several states who formed that instrument, being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of its infraction, and that a NULLIFICATION by those sovereignties, of all unauthorized acts done under color of that instrument, is the rightful remedy.”                                                             Thomas Jefferson

States are waking up to their responsibility to defend their citizen’s Health Care Freedom

In the last year, the Federal Government has decided that the commerce clause not only gives them the power to regulate what you buy, but it can be used as a rationale to tell you what to buy. This power grab is unprecedented and the vast majority of Americans want the legislation repealed. So 39 states are currently in some stage of fighting Obamacare. At least 20 states are pursuing legal means to stop its implementation while still others are taking a legislative approach to nullifying the law. 4 States have already passed the healthcare freedom act which declares that two basic rights are protected:

1) The right of individuals to be able to spend their own money to access and receive lawful health care services (and for providers to legally give that care and receive compensation)

2) The right of individuals to choose to not participate in any health care system or plan without a penalty or fine.

States are also waking up to their responsibility to defend their citizen’s 2nd Amendment Rights.

The Federal Government has apparently decided that the commerce clause trumps the 2nd amendment rights of the people and it has restricted and is looking to further restrict the rights of Americans to purchase guns.

But 7 states have already passed the Firearms Freedom Act which declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under the commerce clause. This essentially nullifies the impact of Federal law.

“Nullification begins with the axiomatic point that a federal law that violates the constitution is no law at all. It is void and of no effect. Nullification provides a shield between the people of a state and an unconstitutional law from the federal government.” Thomas Woods, Nullification, Pg 3

The biggest threat to nullification is the judiciary who believes they have the sole right to interpret the constitution. Last year in Florida the HealthCare Freedom Act was kept off the ballot by the Florida Supreme Court because the summary was misleading. The sponsors sought to remedy this by having the entire text of the act placed on the ballot as has been done many times in the past and the judges refused this reasonable request. In essence it was thrown out by activist judges.

A battle surely awaits us at the U.S. Supreme Court.

1803 Marbury Vs Madison
Chief Justice John Marshall stated that the Supreme Court was duty bound, under the oath each Justice takes to support the Constitution, to treat unconstitutional laws of Congress as void, and of no force or effect.

Regardless of which way the Supreme Court rules on obamacare, we the people of the states must press on.

“The Central point behind nullification is that the federal government cannot be permitted to hold a monopoly on constitutional interpretation. If the Federal Government has the exclusive right to judge the extent of its own powers, warned James Madison and Thomas Jefferson in 1798, it will continue to grow- regardless of elections, the separation of powers, and other much touted limits of governmental power” Thomas Woods, Nullification p4.

Hamilton states in Federalist 78; “liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have every thing to fear from its union with either of the other departments.”

“My construction of the constitution is very different from that you quote. It is that each department is truly independent of the others, and has an equal right to decide for itself what is the meaning of the constitution in the cases submitted to its action; and especially, where it is to act ultimately and without appeal.”  Thomas Jefferson, letter to Samuel Adams Wells, May 12, 1819

Keep in mind also that the Constitution does not guarantee a federal judge his position for life, but only for the duration of “good behavior.” Art. III, Sec. 1)

Sixty-one federal judges or Supreme Court Justices have been investigated for impeachment, of whom thirteen have been impeached and seven convicted. The most common reason cited is judicial high handedness.

Centralization of Power is a global phenomenon and it is dangerous

Media, Banking, Food Production, Food Distribution

Fusion of Corporate and National Power

Concentration of Power in the Federal Government and Executive Branch

Concentration of International Power  (IMF/UN)

We should actively oppose centralization of power, usurpation of rights. We should educate ourselves, our neighbors and our elected officials at the state and national level about the many benefits of constitutional government. Benefits such as lower taxes and more liberty which people of all types can rally behind.

The Tenth Amendment Center exists to further this cause. We have a national website at www.tenthamendmentcenter.com . We have local chapters, for example the site for Jacksonville area is www.jaxtac.com . We supply template legislation and we would welcome further volunteers in each area to help us identify sponsors in each state.

In closing, I would remind you the tea party and tenth amendment center share many goals in common and we look forward to working closely with you to reign in an out of control federal government and to restore the principles of constitutional government in the USA.

God Bless America

For further research:

http://www.marksquotes.com/Founding-Fathers/Jefferson/index7.htm

Principles of Natural Law

http://www.constitution.org/burla/burla_1.htm

Biggest Debtor Nation in History of the World

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22736.html

Food Stamp Usage at All Time High

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE4B28CB20081203

Congressman protests reading of constitution

http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/2011/01/06/democrat-congressman-protests-reading-constitution-on-house-floor/

Track the progress of the healthcare freedom act

http://www.ushealthfreedomcoalition.com/

Track the progress of the firearm freedom act

http://firearmsfreedomact.com/state-by-state/

Global trend towards eroding freedom

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b7ab9f89dccc945f6545ca445a6fac5a.4a1&show_article=1

Concentration of US Media

http://www.freepress.net/ownership/chart/main

Media ownership changes over past twenty years

http://www.corporations.org/media/

Seed Company Consolidation

http://www.good.is/post/the-seed-industry-s-scary-consolidation

Learn about the Tenth Amendment Center and its template legislation

www.tenthamendmentcenter.com   / http://florida.tenthamendmentcenter.com / www.jaxtac.com

Track the locations of the Nullify Now Conferences, coming soon to an area near you.

http://www.nullifynow.com/